Revisiting the Estimation of Unigram Surprisal in Computational Psycholinguistics

Data Explorer

Compare unigram surprisal estimators in GAMMs with different predictors, dependent variables (reading time measures with or without log transforms and ERPs), outlier removal, and multiple comparison approaches.

Notes:

Source
Compare estimators
vs
Analysis choices
Multiple comparisons
A B * difference significant (p<.05) bars = 95% CI